ORDER

Jamie Waters (hereinafter, “Movant”) pleaded guilty to robbery in the first degree, Section 569.020 RSMo (2000). Movant now appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant alleges the motion court erred- in denying her post-conviction motion because there was no factual basis for her guilty plea, and she was not advised by the plea court that robbery in the first degree was a dangerous felony.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).