State v. Harman
State v. Harman
273 S.W.3d 584; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 20; 2009 WL 113780
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
State v. Harman
Opinion
ORDER
Kevin Harman appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of first-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.050 RSMo 2000. 1 Harman was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender and sentenced to life in prison. Harman claims the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. We affirm.
No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
1
. All further statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.