Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009

Young v. State

Young v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 20, 2009 · Ahrens, Dowd, Sullivan
280 S.W.3d 101; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 29; 2009 WL 113857 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Young v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Nathaniel Young appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his “Motion to Re-Open Original Postconviction Case Att’y Daniel Reardon Failed to File an Amended 29.15 Motion” (the Motion). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court did not err in denying the Motion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.