In the Interest of L.L. v. L.L.
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- C.V.E. v. Greene County Juvenile Office (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)
- IN THE INTEREST OF: H.M.W. and W.E.L., children under seventeen years of age. GREENE COUNTY JUVENILE OFFICE, Petitioner-Respondent v. R.W. (Mo. Ct. App. 2023)
- In re Lm (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)
- R.J.M. v. Phelps County Juvenile Office (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
L.L. appeals the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights to his children, R.D. and L.L. On appeal, he claims that the trial court erred in terminating his parental rights because the Juvenile Officer did not present clear, cogent, and convincing evidence to support termination upon any statutory ground. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.