Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009

Dixon v. State

Dixon v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 29, 2009 · Cohen, Dowd, Sullivan
292 S.W.3d 929; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1398; 2009 WL 3086006 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Dixon v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joe Lee Dixon appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, following an evi-dentiary hearing, his amended Motion to *930Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P.2008, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.