Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009

State v. Bass

State v. Bass
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 29, 2009 · Cohen, Dowd, Sullivan
292 S.W.3d 930; 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1389; 2009 WL 3086014 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Bass

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Bass (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of forcible rape, forcible sodomy, and first-degree assault. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b)..

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.