Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010

Shealey v. Ameristar Casino St. Charles, Inc.

Shealey v. Ameristar Casino St. Charles, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 18, 2010 · Crane, Ahrens, Baker
310 S.W.3d 777; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 672; 2010 WL 1978205 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Shealey v. Ameristar Casino St. Charles, Inc.

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dorothy Shealey appeals pro se from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s decision finding that she was disqualified for unemployment compensation benefits because she was discharged for misconduct connected with her work.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.