Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010

Miller v. State

Miller v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 11, 2010 · Odenwald, Gaertner
310 S.W.3d 303; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 616; 2010 WL 1860795 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Miller v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael W. Miller appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, following an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion under Rule 29.15 1 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use *304 only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2009, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.