ERRASTI v. State
ERRASTI v. State
310 S.W.3d 753; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 676; 2010 WL 1976760
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
ERRASTI v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Pelayo Errasti, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.