Burnett v. State
Burnett v. State
314 S.W.3d 881; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 972; 2010 WL 2817208
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Burnett v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Derrick Burnett appeals from the motion court’s denial of his post-conviction motion and contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call two witnesses. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.