Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010

Eaton v. Division of Employment Security

Eaton v. Division of Employment Security
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 19, 2010 · Crane, Ahrens, Baker
301 S.W.3d 133; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 21 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Eaton v. Division of Employment Security

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant, Christine Eaton, appeals pro se from the Order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the decision denying claimant unemployment compensation benefits.

The Order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. A written opinion inciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the Order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.