Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010

Pearson v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE

Pearson v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 16, 2010 · Crane, Ahrens, Baker
306 S.W.3d 653; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 158; 2010 WL 528069 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Pearson v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Director of Revenue appeals from the trial court’s judgment reinstating the driving privileges of petitioner, Anthony C. Pearson, after the Director suspended them pursuant to section 302.505 RSMo (2000). The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memoran *654 dum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.