Ezell v. State
Ezell v. State
313 S.W.3d 744; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 927; 2010 WL 2649830
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Ezell v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. Charles W. Ezell appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Ezell asserts that trial counsel was ineffective for causing the introduction of damaging credibility evidence.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.