INGRIM v. State
INGRIM v. State
309 S.W.3d 842; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 244; 2010 WL 691945
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
INGRIM v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Jason Ingrim appeals from the motion court’s denial of his post-conviction motion filed pursuant to Rule 29.15 on the basis that his trial counsel was ineffective. Because Ingrim has failed to present any evidence of prejudice, the judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.