Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010

Anderson v. State

Anderson v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 9, 2010 · Gaertner, Hoff, Cohen
324 S.W.3d 494; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1513; 2010 WL 4489996 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Anderson v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Antonio Anderson appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a *495 memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.