Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010

State v. Smith

State v. Smith
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 31, 2010 · Sullivan, Ahrens, Mooney
318 S.W.3d 787; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1151; 2010 WL 3398402 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Smith

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James A. Smith appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of possession of a controlled substance. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court committed no plain error. Rule 30.20; 1 *788 State v. Washington, 260 S.W.3d 875, 879 (Mo.App. E.D. 2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2008, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.