Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010

Wilson v. State

Wilson v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 9, 2010 · Norton, Hoff, Mooney
330 S.W.3d 499; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 269; 2010 WL 785324 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Wilson v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terry L. Wilson (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Judgment (Judgment) denying his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct the Judgment or Sentence, filed pursuant to Rule 29.15, on his conviction of first-degree tampering.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The Judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2); Rule 29.15(k). No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.