Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010

Taylor v. State

Taylor v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided December 21, 2010 · Gaertner, Hoff, Cohen
327 S.W.3d 626; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1753; 2010 WL 5174454 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Taylor v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Samuel Taylor (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment (judgment) denying his Rule 29.15 Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence (PCR Motion), entered following an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.