Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010

State v. Ross

State v. Ross
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 31, 2010 · Pfeiffer, Howard, Ahuja
318 S.W.3d 770; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1125; 2010 WL 3394473 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Ross

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Bobby Ross appeals from his conviction after a jury trial of statutory sodomy in the first degree. § 566.062, RSMo. In his sole Point Relied On, Ross claims the trial court abused its discretion in overruling his objections to the testimony of two witnesses concerning out-of-court statements made by his minor victim, because the testimony was duplicative and improperly bolstered the victim’s testimony. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.