Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010

Ballard v. Hudson

Ballard v. Hudson
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 7, 2010 · Pfeiffer, Howard, Ahuja
320 S.W.3d 219; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1287; 2010 WL 3812606 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Ballard v. Hudson

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellants Bruce W. Ballard, et al. appeal the Boone County Circuit Court’s grant of a directed verdict at the close of opening statements in favor of defendants Milbre Burch, Berkely Hudson, and Oak-stone Construction Company. Ballard argues that the facts he recited during opening statement were sufficient to establish submissible claims of negligence and trespass against the defendants, and that the trial court erroneously excluded the testimony of one of his expert witnesses. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.