Reeder v. State
Reeder v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Charles L. Reeder (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of Circuit Court of the *530 City of St. Louis denying his Rule 24.035 1 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. Sup.Ct. R. (2010), unless otherwise indicated.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.