Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010

SIDNER v. State

SIDNER v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided December 28, 2010 · Odenwald, Dowd, Baker
328 S.W.3d 494; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1788; 2010 WL 5313489 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

SIDNER v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Elliott Sidner (Sidner) appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. After a bench trial, Sidner was convicted of trafficking in the second degree and misdemeanor possession of a controlled substance of marijuana. Sidner was sentenced as a prior and persistent drug offender to ten years of imprisonment without the possibility of probation or parole. This Court affirmed Sidner’s convictions in State v. Sidner, 217 S.W.3d 344 (Mo.App. E.D. 2007). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.