ORDER

Ronald Burston appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree tampering. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court committed no plain error. Rule 30.20; 1 State v. Nylon, 311 S.W.3d 869, 884 (Mo.App. E.D. 2010). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to-Rule 30.25(b).