KING, KREHBIEL, HELLMICH & BORBONUS, LLC v. Essen
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Lockhart v. State (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ORDER
Carl D. Essen (Essen) appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of King, Krehbiel, Hellmich, and Borbonus, LLC (Respondent). Following a bench trial, *543 the trial court found that Respondent was entitled to recover on a contract for an account of $5,475.00 plus interest. We find that substantial evidence supports the trial court’s judgment and we affirm the judgment.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find Essen is entitled to no relief on appeal. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.