Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010

State v. Modesitt

State v. Modesitt
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 9, 2010 · Norton, Hoff, Mooney
330 S.W.3d 498; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 283; 2010 WL 785309 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Modesitt

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Paul Modesitt appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury for two counts of criminal nonsupport, in violation of Section 568.040, RSMo 2000, 1 for which he was sentenced to two concurrent terms of four years imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. Unless otherwise indicated, all further refer-enees are to RSMo 2000.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.