Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010

Wild v. State

Wild v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 21, 2010 · Sullivan, Ahrens, Mooney
320 S.W.3d 244; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1266; 2010 WL 3637496 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Wild v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tracy Wild (Appellant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment dismissing with prejudice her Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 24.035 motion for postconviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court did not clearly err in dismissing Appellant’s motion as untimely. Rule 24.035(b); Thomas v. State, 249 S.W.3d 234, 238 (Mo.App. E.D. 2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment *245 pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.