Rosenthal v. State
Rosenthal v. State
323 S.W.3d 96; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1420; 2010 WL 4075771
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Rosenthal v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Kevin Rosenthal (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of *97 St. Louis County denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
1
. All rule references are to Mo. Sup.Ct. R. (2007), unless otherwise indicated.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.