Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010

Brinker v. CAPITAL RESTORATION & PAINTING COMPANY

Brinker v. CAPITAL RESTORATION & PAINTING COMPANY
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided December 21, 2010 · Norton, Crane
332 S.W.3d 222 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Brinker v. CAPITAL RESTORATION & PAINTING COMPANY

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Capital Restoration & Painting Company appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of Amanda Brinker for her personal injury claims. We find that the trial court did not err in its judgment in favor of Brinker.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b). 1

1

. Brinker filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for failure to comply with Rule 84.04, which was taken with the case. The motion is denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.