Frye v. Speedway Chevrolet Cadillac

Missouri Court of Appeals August 10, 2010

Frye v. Speedway Chevrolet Cadillac, 315 S.W.3d 786 (2010)

2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1025; 2010 WL 3118593

Smart, Pfeiffer, Martin

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Speedway Chevrolet Cadillac, Inc. (“Speedway”), Daniel F. Ladd (“Ladd”), the President of Speedway, and Brice Ack-erman (“Ackerman”), the General Sales Manager of Speedway, (collectively the “Defendants”) appeal from the trial court’s order denying Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration of Larry Frye’s employment related claims. The Defendants contend that a program adopted by Speedway after Larry Frye began employment with Speedway and is a legally enforceable contract. We affirm the trial court’s denial of Defendants’ motion to compel arbitration. 84.16(b). 1

. This Order has been issued contemporaneously with this Court’s Opinion in Kimberly Frye v. Speedway Chevrolet Cadillac, WD 71757. Mr. Frye’s motion for consolidation of this case with the aforesaid case was taken with the case and is denied.

Reference

Full Case Name: Larry FRYE, Respondent, v. SPEEDWAY CHEVROLET CADILLAC, Et Al., Appellants
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published