Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010

Rucker v. State

Rucker v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 26, 2010 · Gaertner, III, Odenwald
302 S.W.3d 729; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 63; 2010 WL 286687 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Rucker v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Rucker appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his amended Motion under Rule 29.151 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crira. P.2008, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.