Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010

Matthews v. Graham

Matthews v. Graham
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 12, 2010 · Crane, III, Norton
323 S.W.3d 80; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1365; 2010 WL 3971331 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Matthews v. Graham

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Maureen Matthews appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Barbara Graham and Eastman, Dillon, Graham, and Goldfarb, LLP (“Counsel”) on her petition for legal malpractice, breach of contract, unjust enrichment, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of fiduciary duty. We find that the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of Counsel.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.