Rulo v. State
Rulo v. State
323 S.W.3d 82; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1347; 2010 WL 3971478
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Rulo v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant, George E. Rulo, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.