Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010

Johnson v. State

Johnson v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 19, 2010 · Cohen, Gaertner, Hoff
323 S.W.3d 91; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1390; 2010 WL 4075729 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Johnson v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lonnell L. Johnson appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.151 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑