Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010

In the Interest of A.D.G.

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 2, 2010 · Ahrens, Mooney, Sullivan

329 S.W.3d 395 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

In re Adg (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

B.G. appeals from the trial court’s judgment terminating his parental rights to A.D.G. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not contrary to the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. In re S.R.J., Jr., 250 S.W.3d 402, 406 (Mo.App. E.D. 2008). An extended opinion *396would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.