Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011

Davis v. State

Davis v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 22, 2011 · Sullivan, Ahrens, Mooney
331 S.W.3d 723; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 226; 2011 WL 590364 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Davis v. State

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Norman Davis, Jr. (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.