Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011

Williams v. DUTCHTOWN CARE CENTER, INC.

Williams v. DUTCHTOWN CARE CENTER, INC.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 15, 2011 · Sullivan, Ahrens, Mooney
333 S.W.3d 544; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 327; 2011 WL 902109 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Williams v. DUTCHTOWN CARE CENTER, INC.

Opinion

*545 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant Kimberly Williams appeals from the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission finding that Claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because she committed misconduct connected with work as defined by section 288.030.1(23) RSMo 2009. Claimant asserts that the Commission erred in concluding that her absenteeism constituted misconduct.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The order of the Commission is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.