Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011

SHOULTS v. State

SHOULTS v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 18, 2011 · Gaertner, Hoff, Cohen
329 S.W.3d 755; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 37; 2011 WL 135014 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

SHOULTS v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michelle Shoults appeals from the judgment denying her Rule 24.035 1 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(h), (k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.