Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011

Naylor v. State

Naylor v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 1, 2011 · Sullivan, Ahrens, Mooney
332 S.W.3d 923; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 251; 2011 WL 692846 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Naylor v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Arlando M. Naylor (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.085 without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.