Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011

Barnett v. Duncan

Barnett v. Duncan
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 15, 2011 · Gaertner, Hoff, Cohen
331 S.W.3d 360; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 174; 2011 WL 546579 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Barnett v. Duncan

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steve and Cindy Duncan, who appeared at trial pro se, appeal from the trial court’s grant of the consolidated petitions for ejectment filed by Richard and Barbara Barnett and Orville and Rosalee Garland against the Duncans. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court’s finding is supported by substantial evidence. Murphy v. Canon, 536 S.W.2d *361 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for them use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2010).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.