Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011

Todisman v. Todisman

Todisman v. Todisman
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 8, 2011 · Norton, Crane
336 S.W.3d 485; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 287; 2011 WL 794829 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Todisman v. Todisman

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Patricia Ann Todisman appeals the judgment dissolving her marriage to James Dean Todisman. We find the trial court’s judgment was not erroneous. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.