Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011

Washington v. MERIDIAN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES

Washington v. MERIDIAN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided January 18, 2011 · Richter, Crane, Romines
332 S.W.3d 282; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 38; 2011 WL 135743 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Washington v. MERIDIAN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Claimant appeals from two final awards of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, each affirming a separate award of the Administrative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.