DeJESUS-ANDUJAR v. State
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Seaton v. Seaton (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Order
This is a Rule 29.15 case. Sandrio De-Jesus-Andujar (“Movant”) claims that the Circuit Court of Livingston County (“motion court”) erred in denying his Rule 29.15 motion because Movant was denied effective assistance of trial counsel and the right to testify in his own defense. Mov-ant claims that neither his trial counsel nor the trial court ever told him that he could testify at his trial or that the decision whether or not to testify was his to make. He concludes that he did not voluntarily waive his right to testify. We affirm the decision of the motion court. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.