Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011

Bowman v. State

Bowman v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 17, 2011 · Sullivan, Ahrens, Mooney
341 S.W.3d 749; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 686; 2011 WL 1899756 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Bowman v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Adrian Bowman (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion 1 for post-conviction relief from his conviction of and sentence for first-degree murder, first-degree assault, and two counts of armed criminal action after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. McFadden v. State, 256 S.W.3d 103, 105-6 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2005, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.