*214 ORDER

Susan Manning-Chisholm appeals from a judgment dissolving her marriage to Steven Chisholm, which was entered following her failure to appear at the trial of the dissolution action. Manning-Chisholm argues that the trial court erroneously refused to set the judgment aside, and that the court’s custody determination and division of marital property are not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).