ORDER

Daniel Foster appeals the motion court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction DNA testing under Section 547.035 RSMo. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the recoi’d on appeal. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).