Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011

Fiorella v. State

Fiorella v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 6, 2011 · Howard, Ahuja, Mitchell
347 S.W.3d 183; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1144; 2011 WL 3889162 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Fiorella v. State

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

This is a Rule 29.15 case. The issue is whether the movant’s right to a competent attorney was violated by virtue of his trial counsel’s alleged failure to investigate whether the police prematurely deemed his request for an attorney abandoned after they had requested that he take a breath test. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.