Fiorella v. State
Fiorella v. State
347 S.W.3d 183; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1144; 2011 WL 3889162
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- State v. McCauley (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Order
This is a Rule 29.15 case. The issue is whether the movant’s right to a competent attorney was violated by virtue of his trial counsel’s alleged failure to investigate whether the police prematurely deemed his request for an attorney abandoned after they had requested that he take a breath test. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.