Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011

Beck v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 25, 2011 · Crane, Mooney, Romines

351 S.W.3d 250; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1427; 2011 WL 5064917 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Lindenau v. ST. LOUIS ARC, INC. (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Beck appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. And the motion court’s conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.