Harper v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Harper v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
341 S.W.3d 889; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 733
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Harper v. CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Opinion
ORDER
Dana Harper appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her unemployment benefits on the ground that she was discharged for misconduct connected with her work. We find that the Commission did not err in its decision.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The Commission’s decision is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.