Revels v. State
Revels v. State
354 S.W.3d 674; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1702; 2011 WL 6638292
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Revels v. State
Opinion
ORDER
Jay Revels (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. This Court affirmed Movant’s convictions, following a jury trial, in his direct appeal, State v. Revels, 177 S.W.3d 865 (Mo.App. E.D. 2005). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.