Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011

Rodgers v. State

Rodgers v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 25, 2011 · Ahrens, Richter, Gaertner
355 S.W.3d 496; 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1418; 2011 WL 5065259 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Rodgers v. State

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Reginald Rodgers appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his motion to reopen post-conviction proceedings due to abandonment by his appointed post-conviction counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.